Comparison of Damato campimetry and Humphrey automated perimetry results in a clinical population
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Comparison of Damato campimetry and Humphrey automated perimetry results in a clinical population.
BACKGROUND/AIMS The purpose of the study was to evaluate patients' ease of understanding of Damato campimetry assessment and to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the results compared with Humphrey automated perimetry. METHODS Patients underwent Humphrey perimetry and Damato campimetry on the same day. Patients were excluded if they were unable to undergo Humphrey perimetry. Results...
متن کاملClinical comparison of frequency doubling technology perimetry and Humphrey perimetry.
AIM To determine the number of missed points on frequency doubling technology (FDT) perimetry that optimise the sensitivity and specificity of the test and to determine the topographical accuracy of the test in a clinical setting. METHODS In a prospective study, the perimetric data from 99 patients who underwent both FDT perimetry in the screening mode and Humphrey 24-2 (H24-2) were used to d...
متن کاملComparison of Octopus Semi-Automated Kinetic Perimetry and Humphrey Peripheral Static Perimetry in Neuro-Ophthalmic Cases
Aim. To compare semikinetic perimetry (SKP) on Octopus 900 perimetry to a peripheral static programme with Humphrey automated perimetry. Methods. Prospective cross-section study comparing Humphrey full field (FF) 120 two zone programme to a screening protocol for SKP on Octopus perimetry. Results were independently graded for presence/absence of field defect plus type and location of defect. Re...
متن کاملScreening for glaucoma with frequency-doubling technology and Damato campimetry.
OBJECTIVE To assess frequency-doubling technology (FDT) perimetry (Humphrey Systems, San Leandro, Calif) and Damato campimetry (Precision Vision, Villa Park, Ill) for detecting glaucoma in a public glaucoma screening. METHODS A 2-day public glaucoma screening was held at 2 different institutions. Each subject underwent 2 visual field screening tests (Damato campimetry and FDT perimetry in scr...
متن کاملA comparison of Goldmann and Humphrey automated perimetry in patients with glaucoma.
Humphrey automated threshold perimetry (Program 30-2) was performed on 42 eyes of 25 patients with glaucoma to determine both the sensitivity and specificity of automated perimetry in detecting glaucomatous visual field defects. Automated perimetry sensitivity was 90.38%, while automated perimetry specificity was 91%. Fifty-two patients and a technician took part in a survey to determine their ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: British Journal of Ophthalmology
سال: 2010
ISSN: 0007-1161
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2009.161240